Our Service Area Los Angeles Experts Your FICO score Improve Your Credit Score Disputing Credit Reports


January 12th, 2020 4:00 PM

Dear Friends,

I surmise within 7 to 10 days, the 45th President will have the opportunity to defend himself from the presumed 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' alleged by the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives. Articles of Impeachment were formed by an 'impeachment inquiry' that lacked the Constitutional understanding of 'due process'. The clandestine closed door method in which this inquiry obtained its hearsay evidence of disgruntled diplomats and legal analysts was an exercise in futility. Common sense was no longer utilized by the participants in a performance that lacked the requisite substance of integrity required in its presentation of the facts.

 When the transcript of the conversation last Summer wherein the Chief Executive and the Ukrainian President was revealed to have no references to a 'quid pro quo' nor plans to withdraw the funding of weapons approved by the government, an attempt towards redemption began in earnest. The opposition party along with the media and its leftist supporters were eager to mislead the American public 'by all means necessary' in their numerous attempts to destroy the reputation and the legitimacy of a man deemed victorious in the 2016 General Election. The trials of those encumbered with a mental block is remarkable! These individuals and various entities, have divulged their hatred for this President and over 50% of the American electorate - with an incessant obsession that has a pronounced prognosis for mental illness. The tribulations suffered by both sides of a simple equation to ascertain the truth, can be recognized by the impartial transcript of the conversation itself.

In regards to the upcoming trial, there's no need for the Senate to call additional witnesses. It is the responsibility of the House of Representatives to provide the Senate an iron clad case in which reasonable doubt is not considered a factor. After the Senate reviews the case formulated by the opposition party, a dismissal or an acquittal will be considered as a fair alternative - by ending the illegitimate attempt to forcefully remove a duly elected President. If the Senate majority determines witnesses are obliged to testify - which runs contrary to the procedures outlined in the Constitution - the main participants must include the following:

1. The 'informant' that provided the...

2. 'Whistleblower' with details of the conversation along with...

3. The Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, in his demonstrable behavior of contempt for the rule of law and a defendant's 'due process', conceived as predominant in the Constitution.

As a concerned American citizen, the future of this country affects us all. The nation will view this trial as an unnecessary tribulation, comprised by hatred and resentment of a President that has implemented successful government policies - too numerous to mention.

Thanks again for your continuous support.

Posted in:General
Posted by Jesse Dorado on January 12th, 2020 4:00 PMPost a Comment

Subscribe to this blog



My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog: